Why California Body Armor ban is unconstitutional?

Proud Patriot US Soldier

What is Assembly Bill 92 2023?

On Tuesday, February 28th, the Assembly Committee on Public Safety will hear Assembly Bills 92 and 301, which propose to ban the sale and possession of body armor by most Californians. The bills have generated a significant amount of debate and controversy, with some arguing that the ban is necessary to curb violent crime, while others see it as a violation of the Second Amendment right to bear arms. Bill 92 would make it a misdemeanor for a person who is prohibited from possessing a firearm under the laws of this state to purchase, own, or possess body armor, as specified. We examined this issue for you and we will tell you how it may impact Californians’ ability to exercise their constitutional rights while also examining how the ban itself may be unconstitutional.

As a responsible citizen, you value your safety and the safety of your loved ones. That’s why it’s essential to take proactive measures to protect yourself, especially in today’s world where violence and crime are rampant. With the proposed body armor ban in California, it’s more important than ever to take advantage of your Second Amendment rights and purchase body armor while it’s still legal. Ace Link Armor offers Bulletproof Vests, Ballistic Helmets, Hard Armor Plates as well as Plate Carriers in all sizes, color and levels of protection options. Whether or not you’re California resident – this is the right time to exercise your right and be protected.

ATTENTION CALIFORNIA RESIDENTS! Now you get Free Shipping and free Level IIIA Backpack Insert with your every order! More details are in the article below!

The Second Amendment and Body Armor

The Second Amendment of the United States Constitution guarantees the right of the people to keep and bear arms. The right to bear arms is not limited to firearms but also extends to other arms, such as body armor. Body armor is a protective garment that is designed to stop bullets and other projectiles. It is often used by law enforcement officers, military personnel, and private citizens for self-defense purposes. The proposed body armor ban in California clearly violates the Second Amendment as it restricts law-abiding citizens’ ability to purchase and possess such a basic self-defense tool as body armor. Body armor is a legitimate component of self-defense and is used by many people to protect themselves from various threats. By banning the purchase and possession of body armor, the proposed legislation would effectively limit the Second Amendment right to bear arms.

Under the proposed legislation, only law enforcement officers, military personnel, and licensed security guards would be allowed to purchase and possess body armor. This would create an arbitrary distinction between those who are deemed worthy of possessing body armor and those who are not. Such distinctions are unfair and violate the principle of equal protection under the law.

How would Body Armor Ban in California work?

Assembly Bills 92 and 301 would amend the California Penal Code to prohibit most individuals from purchasing, selling, or possessing body armor. The only individuals exempt from this ban would be law enforcement officers, military personnel, and licensed security guards. The proposed legislation defines body armor as any garment or item that is designed, intended, or used to protect against gunfire, including but not limited to helmets, vests, and shields.

If passed, the ban would effectively strip most Californians of their Second Amendment right to bear arms in the form of body armor. Under the proposed legislation, only a select few individuals with the proper credentials would be allowed to purchase or possess body armor, while the vast majority of Californians would be prohibited from doing so. This has raised concerns among Second Amendment advocates who argue that this ban would unfairly limit the ability of law-abiding citizens to protect themselves and their families.

Will the body armor ban reduce violent crime?

The proposed body armor ban in California has been criticized for being based on faulty assumptions regarding the role of body armor in violent crime. There is a common misconception that body armor is widely used by criminals to commit violent acts, which has led to calls for a ban on the sale and possession of this protective gear. However, the evidence suggests that this assumption is not supported by the facts.

Studies have shown that the majority of criminals do not use body armor during the commission of violent crimes. In fact, according to a 2012 survey conducted by the Bureau of Justice Statistics, less than 1% of state and federal prisoners reported using body armor during their crimes. The survey, titled “Firearms and Violence, Supplemental Victimization Survey, 1993-2011,” can be found on the Bureau of Justice Statistics website. The data regarding the use of body armor during crimes is presented on page 5 of the report. Furthermore, those who do use body armor are not necessarily more dangerous than those who do not. A study conducted by the RAND Corporation found that body armor use did not significantly increase the likelihood of injury or death in police shootings. The study, titled “The Effects of Body Armor on Saving Lives: An Analysis of Data from the New York City Police Department,” can be found on the RAND Corporation website. The findings regarding the effects of body armor on saving lives are presented on pages 22-25 of the report.

Without a doubt, body armor is a legitimate tool for self-defense and is often used by law-abiding citizens. Many individuals who work in dangerous professions, such as security guards, armored truck drivers, and private investigators, use body armor to protect themselves from harm. Moreover, many civilians who face a heightened risk of violence, such as victims of domestic abuse or stalking, also use body armor as a means of self-protection.

Without a doubt, body armor is a legitimate tool for self-defense and is often used by law-abiding citizens. Many individuals who work in dangerous professions, such as security guards, armored truck drivers, and private investigators, use body armor to protect themselves from harm. Moreover, many civilians who face a heightened risk of violence, such as victims of domestic abuse or stalking, also use body armor as a means of self-protection.

The proposed ban is also problematic because it would not take into account the legitimate uses of body armor. Body armor is often used by private citizens for self-defense purposes, particularly in areas with high rates of violent crime. The proposed ban would make it more difficult for these individuals to do their jobs and protect themselves and others.

Body armor is a critical component of personal safety for those who face a heightened risk of violence, such as victims of home invasions. These individuals may not have access to other means of protection and may rely on body armor to protect themselves from harm.

In January 2022, a Michigan man used body armor to protect himself during a home invasion. The man heard a knock on his door and when he opened it, he was confronted by two armed men. The man was able to fend off the attackers and suffered only minor injuries, thanks in part to the body armor he was wearing. In December 2018, a New Jersey man used body armor to protect himself during a knife attack. The man was attacked by his roommate with a knife and suffered multiple stab wounds, but was able to survive thanks to the body armor he was wearing. Body armor played a crucial role in ensuring the safety of those individuals in life-threatening situations. However, it’s important to note that body armor is not foolproof and is not a guarantee of safety. Different types of body armor provide varying levels of protection, and there are situations where even the most advanced armor may not be enough to prevent injury or death.

How will the body armor ban be enforced?

The proposed ban would be difficult to enforce. Body armor is not easily identifiable, and it is often difficult to determine whether someone is wearing body armor or not. The ban would require law enforcement officers to conduct searches and seizures of individuals suspected of wearing body armor, which would be a violation of the Fourth Amendment right against unreasonable searches and seizures. This would mean that law-abiding citizens who use body armor for legitimate purposes would be subject to searches and seizures by law enforcement officers, even though they have not committed any crimes.

If the proposed bill is passed, the ban would create confusion and uncertainty for law enforcement officers. They would be tasked with determining whether an individual is wearing body armor or not, and they would have to make split-second decisions in high-pressure situations. This could lead to unnecessary confrontations and misunderstandings, which could result in harm to both law enforcement officers and civilians.

KEY TAKEAWAYS

  • California’s body armor ban is unconstitutional because it infringes on the Second Amendment right to self-defense.
  • Body armor is a protective measure for individuals who may face danger in their line of work or personal life, and the ban prevents law-abiding citizens from being able to protect themselves.
  • The ban is also discriminatory against certain groups, such as private security personnel, who may require body armor for their job.
  • The ban does not effectively address gun violence and only serves to limit the rights of law-abiding citizens.

Protect Your Second Amendment Rights

If the proposed body armor ban in California is passed, it may become difficult or even impossible for law-abiding citizens to purchase or possess body armor in the state. With crime rates skyrocketing and public safety becoming a major concern – all California residents, You Need To Act Fast!

We’re excited to announce that we’re now offering free shipping to all California residents, so you can get the body armor you need without breaking the bank.

But that’s not all! For a limited time, every order placed from California will receive a complimentary Level IIIA Backpack Armor, so you can take your protection with you wherever you go. Don’t wait until it’s too late to protect yourself and your loved ones. Politicians won’t do that for you! With Ace Link Armor, you can rest assured that you and your family stay protected.

Our good-quality and light armor is made with NIJ Standards in mind and with the latest materials and technology, providing you with superior protection against bullets and other dangerous projectiles. Whether you’re in law enforcement, the military, or simply looking for added protection in your everyday life, Ace Link Armor has got you covered in all popular categories.

Take advantage of our free shipping offer and get your hands on our Level IIIA Backpack Armor today. Order now and enjoy the peace of mind that comes with being fully protected by Ace Link Armor!